Documentary that follows the struggle for control of Dr. Albert C. Barnes' 25 billion dollar collection of modern and post-impressionist art.
Be first to see the great new films of the year from festivals around the world -- before they come out commercially in the U.S.

Want to discover the next great film or actor? Join Talk Cinema for one of our film festival tours. Lifelong memories are waiting.

Talk Cinema brings you festival news, exclusive interviews and reviews from our founder, Harlan Jacobson.
![]() |
4.1 (9) |
| Directed by: | Don Argott |
| Year: | 2009 |
| Country: | US |
| Language: | English |
| Running Time: | 101 minutes |
| Genre | Documentary |
| Rating | n/a |
|
|
|
|
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
54% EXCELLENT43% GOOD 97% OVERALL FAVORABLE 83% WOULD RECOMMEND 14% MIGHT 97% OVERALL RECOMMEND Ron Falzone led the post-screening TALK CINEMA discussion. TALK CINEMA subscribers in Glenview write: Wow! Great story well told. Good propaganda, good discussion (M25-34). Very informative, loved all beautiful art ( F65+). Smiled throughout – political thriller (35-49). Remarkable microcosm of our society (65+). My favorite Cezannes! I found them! If only I had $25 billion (F35-49). Sad commentary on theft by legal means of private property (F50-64). A travesty fueled by greed and the corruption of law by the legal system. Power grab of epic proportion (F65+). Sickens me to see the American legal system misused for government’s ability to revise a persons trust and abuse of private property ( F25-34). More entertaining and emotional than fiction (F50-64). Gripping. One lesson: read the budget (F65+). Why does everything have to be mass consumed? Something appealing about the Barnes foundation being focused on education, makes the experience more special ( F35-49). Mixed to negative: Interesting but too long, had already made its point (F65+). Only good thing about the film was the discussion it initiates (M50-64). User Review
|
Was this review helpful to you?
Reviewed by Talk Cinema Glenview
March 31, 2010 Top 10 Reviewer View all my reviews Report this review |
|
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
61% EXCELLENT39% GOOD 100% OVERALL FAVORABLE 90% WOULD RECOMMEND 10% MIGHT 100% OVERALL RECOMMEND Harlan Jacobson led the post-screening TALK CINEMA. TALK CINEMA subscribers in Purchase, New York write: Gripping (F50-64). Excellent doc especially for art lovers (F65+). Compelling, real life always more interesting than fiction (F50-64). Barnes’ theory was about the education of viewing : this film showed how a great vision becomes deconstructed and corrupted ( F50-64). Important film, sad ending loved the views of the collection (F65+). Fascinating, very well put together, classic cautionary tale (F65+). Very informative, great story, very disturbing ending (F50-64). Is there no end to corporate greed? How exciting – W.M.D. all over again (F50-64). Made me angry and sad, wished they had an alternate ending ( M50-64). Thought-provoking indictment of money and power to trump individual will (F50-64). A very interesting and informative film, I knew very little about the situation (F65+). Terrific, outdoes Michael Moore, moving and inspiring (65+). How depressing that a person’s wishes can be diverted by power-hungry grabbers (65+). Consistently fascinating, infuriating, and funny (F35-49). Mixed to negative: Excellent doc, bit long, sometimes tedious, but very well done (M65+). User Review
|
Was this review helpful to you?
Reviewed by Talk Cinema Purchase
March 31, 2010 Top 50 Reviewer View all my reviews Report this review |
|
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
83% EXCELLENT15% GOOD 98% OVERALL FAVORABLE 93% WOULD RECOMMEND 03% MIGHT 96% OVERALL RECOMMEND Harlan Jacobson led the post-screening TALK CINEMA. TALK CINEMA subscribers in New York write: Was on the edge of my seat as to how this would turn out, a great story, really quite a tragedy from at least half the perspective (F25-34). Very fine (F65+). If you want to protect your legacy you must have many children (M65+). I’m on Governor Rendell’s side, if Montgomery County is so stupid to lose it, they deserve to (F50-64). Well done and generates good discussion (50-64). Great polemic (M50-64). Better and more instructive story than the most creative fiction (M65+). I felt emotionally connected to the film and thought it did a great job of “educating” the public about an important issue (50-64). An absorbing expose very well researched and organized, story mirrors most art world scenarios (50-64). Excellent presentation of tragic ability of powerful forces to alter individuals ability to control their choices (65+). Wonderful, its all about the money (F65+). What a story of betrayal! Beautifully crafted story about how the system works – makes your blood boil (F50-64). Best documentary I’ve seen (65+). Thank you Harlan for brining this jewel of a movie to our class (F50-64). Wonderful exploration of democracy and the intersection of idealism, politics, money and influence that resonates beyond the art world (F65+). When someone says it’s the principle, not the money, it is always the money (M65+). Heartwrenching, have been to the Barnes still trembling thinking about it (M65+). Excellent, I learned a lot (M50-64). Makes me want to turn off NPR when they give credits to foundations (65+). An amazingly clear and detailed account of a very complicated issue… a remarkable exposition of the political maneuvering of politicians, foundations, and moneyed interests (M65+). Once again a black college gets screwed (M25-34). Power corrupts – ya think? (F65+). Very depressing, agree that it was one sided but makes you think about your legacy when you have heirs (F50-64). Drama of fiction without a Hollywood ending (65+). Mixed to negative: Visiting the Barnes is a far superior experience to watching this film about the Barnes (F50-64). Pure propaganda, cant take any argument seriously when only one side is presented (35-49). User Review
|
Was this review helpful to you?
Reviewed by Talk Cinema Lincoln Center
March 31, 2010 Top 10 Reviewer View all my reviews Report this review |
|
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
50% EXCELLENT40% GOOD 90% OVERALL FAVORABLE 79% WOULD RECOMMEND 13% MIGHT RECOMMEND 92% RECOMMEND RESPONSE Tim Rodgers led the post-screening TALK CINEMA discussion. TALK CINEMA subscribers in Scottsdale write: Outstanding (). Excellent! (50-64). Told with great care, money rules the world (M35-49). Wonderful, thank you for the experience, where is justice? (F50-64). Fascinating story, well presented (F50-64). Intelligent, interesting, well done (50-64). Very thought provoking (F50-64). Best part of film is how it showed political games that happen behind the scenes (F50-64). Want to go to Philly to see Barnes collection in its original state before it is moved (F65+). Art as commodity vs art as beauty ( 50-64). Should be seen by all art students and art museum staff (M65+). MIXED TO NEGATIVE: Obviously biased but VERY interesting ( F50-64+). Parochial propaganda and slanted, not great cinema, but well done (M65+). Belongs on 60 minutes rather than at the movies (M35-49). Long and drawn out (F50-64). User Review
|
Was this review helpful to you?
Reviewed by Talk Cinema Scottsdale
March 31, 2010 Top 50 Reviewer View all my reviews Report this review |
|
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful
OUR AUDIENCES RATED THE FILM79% EXCELLENT / 19% GOOD for a 99% OVERALL FAVORABLE 92% WOULD RECOMMEND /6% MIGHT for a 98% OVERALL RECOMMEND Pat Aufderheide led the post-screening TALK CINEMA discussion. TALK CINEMA subscribers in Washington DC write: Excellent, I’m not one who seeks out documentaries, brilliant cinematography, art direction, soundtrack (M25-34). Spectacular, best of the season, excellent storyline very interesting on multi-dimensional level (F50-64). What is the morality of holding art captive in private collections (65+). So many “ifs”: if the Inquirer review had been positive, if Barnes and Annenberg hadn’t gotten into a pissing contest, if Barnes and De Mazia had considered succession planning on par with legal planning, if greed didn’t trump ethics (F65+). As gripping as a drama as if Shakespeare had written a legal and art drama – a great tragedy (50-64). Film plays like a Shakespearian tragedy (35-49). Informative, raises provocative issues, enjoyed the interviews as a vehicle to move the film forward (F65+). Good job with linear detail of complicated story, scary (50-64). Really fascinating story that I didn’t know anything about, felt dirty that I had seen the collection on tour, I can appreciate all sides of a delicate argument (F35-49). Am heading back to Merion as soon as I can to enjoy the collection in its original setting (F65+). Fascinating power struggle using invaluable artworks as the excuse. Will be thinking about this for days. (F50-64). As documentaries go this steps toward mystery and suspense, great nuances of politics, power, race, and class struggle (M50-64). Last one out please turn off the lights, Barnes has left the building (65+). Well presented argument, but having seen the Barnes collection in Merion, I do think the most people seeing it the better (M65+). Powerful portrayal of the social consequences of a personal rivalry that gets embedded in a legal document (M65+). Wonderfully edited, important story, well told (F35-49). I’m a native Philadelphian. I grew up believing that Dr. Barnes was eccentric and hostile to the wider Philadelphia community – now I understand why. He was ahead of his time in more ways than one. Bravo (F35-49). Mixed to Negative: Interesting but one sided (F65+). User Review
|
Was this review helpful to you?
Reviewed by Talk Cinema Washington, DC
March 31, 2010 Top 10 Reviewer View all my reviews Report this review |
